A massive land grab is underway in Missouri and Arkansas.
NGO’s (Non-Governmental Organizations) are lining up other states
to be included in the Department of Interior’s “National Blueway
System” designation. The Blueways System stems from Obama’s
“America’s
Great Outdoors” Presidential Memorandum, under which
Secretary of Interior Salazar issued
Secretarial
Order #3321. (scroll down)
The
first
Blueway designation occurred in May 2012, across the States
of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Connecticut. That
watershed encompasses 7.2 million acres. The “White River National
Blueway” is 17.8 million acres, and includes 60 counties across
Missouri and Arkansas. Not
one elected official from these
60 counties knew a thing about the designation, or the plans put
forward by the “nominating committee”.
Private property rights advocates knew nothing about the plan
either, and when they’d found out about it, the designation had
already been assigned. The “stakeholders”, NONE of whom represent
or are actually private land holders in the area, have put
together a significant list of “Strategic Objectives” to control
the use of land within the 21,000 square mile area.
In the
Memorandum
of Understanding including the triumvirate of Federal
Agencies designating and collaborating on the “National Blueway
System” it states:
“Nothing in this MOU is intended to authorize or affect the
use of private property or is
intended to be the basis for the exercise of any new
regulatory authority.”
Yet when you examine the Nomination pdf that the “stakeholders”
put forth to acquire the designation, there is no way the
objectives can be met without regulation.
First, let’s have a look just who the
non-governmental
stakeholders are and then what they propose to accomplish
with this Blueway.
We have only two entities involved from Missouri. The Missouri
Audubon Society and the Missouri Nature Conservancy along with
their sister groups in Arkansas. Then we have some National level
groups, being Ducks Unlimited, The National Wildlife Refuge
Association, The Conservation Fund, The Arkansas Canoe Club, The
Arkansas Association of Conservation Districts and two local
businesses. No property rights advocates, no land-owner groups, or
farm groups and, importantly, no notification duly elected
officials in Missouri at all, and only a few cities in 1/3 of the
State of Arkansas even heard about this Blueway designation.
Now let’s get to the on the ground effects of the White River
Blueway.
The nominating committee, consisting of the groups above and one
State agency from Missouri and several from Arkansas, spelled out
just what their plans are for the 17.8 million acres in the
watershed in the Nominating pdf. Here are a few highlights from
that plan, which you can find
copied
from the document at prcnews.org.
• Acquiring at total of 548,500 acres throughout the watershed
• Placing 10% of farms into conservation programs and develop
Conservation Programs for 75% of farms
• Reducing on farm water consumption by 20%
• Increase flooding of agricultural land for wildlife habitat by
10% in the first three years and then an additional 20% in 3-7
years
• Set back levees to restore historic floodplain habitat
• Control encroachment on existing floodplain
• Establish a minimum 180 foot wide vegetative buffer zone along
all surface water
There is no way this can be achieved without regulations being
promulgated to enact it. A 180 foot buffer around all surface
water means all streams, seeps, marshes, rivers, ponds and lakes.
Thankfully, unless the definition gets changed, this buffer zone
doesn’t include wet weather creeks.
The on the ground effects of this plan would absolutely
annihilate agriculture within the 60 county area. And agricultural
is by far the biggest economic engine within the region. Tourism
is far, far behind. And with such a great economy, the idea that
tourism is suddenly going to explode as an economic engine is
beyond ridiculous. Nonetheless, that is the apparent economic
benefit we are all supposed to gain from this designation.
The implementation method of this designation and the “integrated
land and water management” that are to be achieved through this
designation are far reaching and far from friendly to those who
live and work on the land within this watershed. According to a
statement from the Secretary of the Interior, the plans are to
establish 5 National Blueways per year for the next five years
ultimately achieving 25 National Blueways throughout the nation.
The very people affected have been completely cut out of the
process and left out of the loop on this issue. No public
meetings, elected official notification, or Federal Register
comments on the viability of a Blueway designation have been
offered. Nor are they required. As of January 9
th, 60
counties in two States have been enrolled in an internationally
driven “conservation estate”.
So if you don’t live within the designated area of the White
River National Blueway, don’t worry, it will be coming to your
area soon. Minnesota and Indiana have National Blueway nominations
under way, and they are not far from being completed. Alabama is
taking a novel approach in stringing together a myriad of Blueways
and apparently waiting until that is achieved to bring in the
final national designation.
The citizens within the White River Blueway designation are
mounting
a truly grass roots effort to overturn the designation and
rescind the specific Memorandum of Understanding that will be used
to place the Audubon Society and Nature Conservancy in the
position of deciding what, if anything, happens on their land.
The method of implementation and the management processes are so
opaque that when a gentleman, striving to get specific information
on the White River Blueway, spoke with a representative from the
Department of Interior he was told, “We don’t know what’s going on
ourselves.” After a day of phone calls where no one could even
figure out who might be in charge of anything associated with this
Blueway designation, he had to give up with a nebulous hope of his
question possibly being answered…..eventually.
We need all boots on the ground to beat this one. If we are
successful in turning over this designation, it will be because
extraordinary effort was made by a great number of people. To find
out how you can help, please go to
SecureArkansas.com,
PrcNews.org for more information
and also contact all the members of the House
Natural Resources
Committee and ask them to overturn this designation and
require the Department of Interior to hold public meetings and
notify elected officials about any potential Blueway designation.
Without our knowledge, without our consent, and without
representation in the process, the Blueway designation is unlawful
and patently un-Constitutional.