|
The
great cities of the East – in Syria and Asia Minor – suffered violent
destruction at the hand of the Arabs in the early seventh century.
Sudden ruin during war, it might be objected, is one thing; these
cities, however, were never rebuilt. In fact, significant archaeological
remains in the entire Mediterranean as well as Middle Eastern regions
(beyond Roman influence) seem to have entirely vanished for the next
three centuries.
Construction
– to say nothing of preservation – was not nurtured by Islam. Indeed,
“almost all knowledge of these countries’ histories disappears, and does
so almost overnight.” Of Egypt, Scott writes that the change imposed
upon them in the early 7th century “can only be described as catastrophic.”
Islamic
lands, as Naipaul recounts with personalized detail, have tended to
experience a measure of what Egypt did so acutely: the effective loss of
her own history. Moreover, another highly significant feature is now
part of the archaeological record: a layer of sediment found throughout
the Mediterranean known as the “Younger Fill.” This stratum of subsoil,
which is not confined to the Mediterranean but is found in all the
shores occupied by Muslims, represents the “geographical signature of
the end of Graeco-Roman civilization.”
This
subsoil was deposited between the mid-seventh and mid-tenth centuries,
precisely coinciding with the deafening archaeological silence. It can
be explained by the wholesale abandonment of irrigational and
agricultural systems when the littoral peoples abandoned coastal
settlements for hilltop fortifications in response to unremitting Muslim
raids.
Scott acknowledges that Pirenne’s overall hypothesis remains disputed.
It
nonetheless dawns on the reader that it was controversial in Pirenne’s
day for the same reason it is today: today’s multiculturalists weren’t
the first to be motivated by animus towards European civilization. One
is thus left to ponder – there really is no sidestepping it – the extent
to which received wisdom on the Dark Ages is a byproduct of prior
predisposition to paint Catholicism as a retrograde force.
Among European countries, incidentally, only the English use the term “Dark Ages”;
Henry VIII and his successors had reasons to make all things Catholic
look dark. Portraying the history of Islam in glowing terms, likewise,
has been another means of denigrating European civilization, and
ultimately Christianity.
Paradoxically, scholars in Communist China, oddly enough, have discovered the truth. As Rodney Stark records in The Victory of Reason, Chinese
scholars undertook a lengthy study of what ultimately accounted for the
West’s pre-eminence. After decades of investigation, they concluded:
not guns, politics, or economics – factors they had felt may have been
decisive. Instead, they were led to something deeper:
The
deeper look – as these Chinese scholars found – always pays the most
dividends. Many today say that what Islam needs most is “reform.” Those
who know it best, however, regard that as wishful thinking – given the
displays of malice making headlines today. The 13th century
Dominican Meister Eckhart inadvertently left us a wise precept when he
wrote: “if God were able to turn away from truth, I would cling to the
truth and let God go.”
That
might sound a bit subtle – or irreverent. But since truth is one of the
names of God – at least in Christian understanding – Eckhart was not
placing anything above God. He was stressing that there can be no
conflict between God and the Truth. It is uncanny how the destiny of
whole peoples – towards flourishing or foundering – hinges on their
perception of such fundamentals.
|
Life is the most important journey one takes in this world. Sharing some of the wisdom to help with your travels is our purpose for this Blog...Gypsy Within!
Saturday, September 06, 2014
Food for thought...Excerpt regarding the dark ages of the 7th to the 10th centuries...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)